gvSIG bugs #1349
Join: fields are added to the original attribute table
| Status: | Closed | % Done: | 0% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Urgent | Spent time: | - | |
| Assignee: |  Juan Lucas Domínguez | |||
| Category: | Document table | |||
| Target version: | 2.0.0-rc2 | |||
| Severity: | Add-on version: | |||
| gvSIG version: | 2.0.0 | Add-on build: | ||
| gvSIG build: | 2056 | Add-on resolve version: | ||
| Operative System: | Add-on resolve build: | |||
| Keywords: | Proyecto: | |||
| Has patch: | No | Hito: | ||
| Add-on name: | Unknown |
Description
The result of a join between the attribute table of a layer an a second table should be a new layer in the ToC which attribute table has both the fileds of the original layer and the fields of the second table. This works fine. The problem is that the fields of the second table are added to the attribute table of the original layer as well. It should remain as it was.
History
#1
Updated by Juan Lucas Domínguez over 11 years ago
- Status changed from New to Awaiting response
Current behavior is that transformation is added to original layer and a new layer based on the same store is added.
If a layer has a transformed store, they cannot be edited to prevent inconsistencies.
If we "clone" the store and apply the transformation to the new layer only, there will be inconsistencies if the original layer is edited.
We cannot replicate the data of course, so. Possible solutions:
- The user will not be able to start edition if the store is shared by other layer (with transformation or not)
-
#2
Updated by Joaquín del Cerro Murciano over 11 years ago
- Assignee set to Juan Lucas Domínguez
#3
Updated by Joaquín del Cerro Murciano over 11 years ago
- Target version changed from 2.0.0-rc1 to 2.0.0-final
#4
Updated by Joaquín del Cerro Murciano over 11 years ago
- Target version changed from 2.0.0-final to 2.0.0-rc2
#5
Updated by Juan Lucas Domínguez over 11 years ago
- Status changed from Awaiting response to Fixed
Fixed behavior of join operation (original table remains the same).
Behavior should be now what Manuel Madrid suggested.
#6
Updated by Álvaro Anguix about 10 years ago
- Status changed from Fixed to Closed