gvSIG bugs #2453
Error en el geoalgoritmo "diferencia" en SEXTANTE
| Status: | Closed | % Done: | 0% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Spent time: | - | |
| Assignee: |  Ignacio Brodín | |||
| Category: | Geoprocess | |||
| Target version: | 2.1.0-2254-testing | |||
| Severity: | Add-on version: | |||
| gvSIG version: | 2.1.0 | Add-on build: | ||
| gvSIG build: | 2221 | Add-on resolve version: | ||
| Operative System: | Add-on resolve build: | |||
| Keywords: | Proyecto: | |||
| Has patch: | No | Hito: | ||
| Add-on name: | Unknown |
Description
Hola,
El geoalgoritmo "diferencia" en SEXTANTE da un resultado erróneo. Esto ya sucedía en la versión 1.12.
Un saludo
Related issues
History
#1
Updated by Álvaro Anguix about 10 years ago
Antonio, he comprobado y a mi me da un resultado que parece correcto (tanto con el difference de gvSIG como el heredado de la librería Sextante).
¿Puedes indicar exactamente dónde se aprecia el error? Y si puedes adjuntar un par de capas con las que te da, ya perfecto.
#2
Updated by Álvaro Anguix about 10 years ago
- Category set to Geoprocess
- Target version set to 2.2.0-2311-rc2
- gvSIG build set to 2221
Comprobado, el de gvSIG funciona correcto y el de Sextante da resultados erróneos en ciertos casos.
#3
Updated by Álvaro Anguix about 10 years ago
- Assignee set to Ignacio Brodín
Quizá lo que se debería hacer, teniendo el algoritmo funcionando en gvSIG y fallando en Sextante, es eliminar el heredado de Sextante, ya que hacen lo mismo y así eliminamos geoprocesos duplicados.
#4
Updated by Antonio Ordóñez López about 10 years ago
Pues sí, puede ser buena opción. Un saludo.
#5
Updated by Antonio Falciano almost 10 years ago
- File sextante_temp_layers.log added
- File sextante_no_temp_layers.log added
- File difference.zip added
Both Difference tools work fine for me with the sample layers in attachment or temporary layers (Create random vector layers). The unique anomaly I can see is the warning about distinct CRSs in the second case (same of #2582).
Can you please attach layers which return erroneous result with SEXTANTE Difference and its related sextante.log file? IMHO the deletion of SEXTANTE Difference is not a good idea, because someone could use it in a model or script yet.
#6
Updated by Álvaro Anguix over 9 years ago
- Related to gvSIG bugs #2834: Difference geoprocess doesn't work added
#7
Updated by Antonio Falciano over 9 years ago
- Target version changed from 2.2.0-2311-rc2 to 2.1.0-2259-rc3
- Status changed from New to Closed
The SEXTANTE Difference works fine in the latest builds (2254 at the time of writing), so I close the ticket.
If the issue will appear again, please reopen the ticket and attach gvSIG.log and sample data in order to reproduce it.
#8
Updated by Joaquín del Cerro Murciano over 9 years ago
- Target version changed from 2.1.0-2259-rc3 to 2.1.0-2254-testing